Post a reply to each of the post attached of at least 400 words . For each thread, students must support their assertions with scholarly citations in APA format. Each reply must incorporate scholarly citations in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years.
How do you think planning in today’s organizations compares to planning in an organization 25 years ago? Do you think planning becomes more important or less important in a world where everything quickly changes and crises are a regular part of organizational life? Why?
Planning is particularly important for organizations; it involves making decisions in advance at the right level about who, what and why they will happen to reach the organizational goals. Goals without a plan are not easily obtainable. “The requirements team members facilitate formal and informal discussions between the stakeholders and project team with the goal to establish a common understanding of the project’s intent” (Marnewick & Joseph, 2020, p.105). Understanding the organizational goals allows them to strategize and plan. It is important for an organization to plan well in advance due to the increased complexity of global and local business models. Process planning has evolved as have organizational strategies. Over the past 25 years technological advances and rapid globalization require organizations to plan much more in-depth strategies and much farther in advance. Computer systems, phones and readily available information were not available 25 years ago so although planning was important 25 years ago the process for gathering information was much more time-consuming but still as important. It is more important for organizations to plan better and for longer today than it was 25 years ago, due to how fast things change in today’s environment. Forecasting the future and planning for the best- and worst-case scenarios is more important today than ever. Information flows quickly and competitors are much quicker to take advantage of missteps today as opposed to 25 years ago.
Is changing the organization’s domain a feasible strategy for coping with a threatening environment? Can you think of an organization in the recent news that has changed its domain? Explain.
Changing an organization’s domain is a feasible strategy for coping with a threating environment. Blockbuster video would have fared better had they taken that advice. Walmart has been known for its big box stores but has changed its tone since losing much of its business to amazon and other internet providers. Walmart has adjusted by opening their own online stores and adapting their in-house stores to smaller “Walmart Neighborhood Market” to compete with the whole food movement. The big box stores are physical assets for the business. However, the market has shifted from product offering where people accepted Amazon and many other food deliveries at home. Walmart has since adjusted “Walmart has a lot of work to do to better compete with Amazon. Its online U.S. sales reached $15.7 billion in the latest fiscal year. That is still a fraction of Amazon’s online global merchandise empire, which reached $122.98 billion last year” (Walmart offers holiday cheer as traditional peers struggle, 2019). According to Streets (2020) this has become even more important due to the COVID-19 crisis where more people are scared to go shopping for the virus and thus driving even more business to E commerce. US (United States) Consumers have steadily been moving toward E commerce at an alarming rate where 85% of consumers were scared or had concern at big box stores. The atmosphere with today’s environment and the virus still looming planning, and strategies looking to the future is more important for Walmart now than ever.
Compare the descriptions of the transnational model described in Chapter 6 to the elements of the learning organization described in Chapter 1. Do you think the transnational model would work in a huge global firm?
According to Daft (2021) “The transnational model represents the most advanced kind of international organization. It reflects the ultimate in both organizational complexity, with many diverse units and organizational coordination, with mechanisms for integrating the varied parts. The transitional model is useful for large, multinational companies with subsidiaries in many countries that try to exploit both global and local advantages as well as technological advancements, rapid innovation, and global learning as knowledge sharing” (p. 254)
The structure of the learning organization is used more for smaller organizations or pushed down to departments in a larger organization. Although the learning organizations provide the workforce a great deal of flexibility to adapt to change. This may be required to push down to departments in a large global firm. Some aspects may need a mechanistic design while others need organic design. Some areas may need the decision making to happen at the location due to resources and time sensitivity. A lot of the learning organization structure can be successful in a large organization, but it would have to be sporadic. Daft (2021) outlines how “management philosophy is based on interdependence rather than either full divisional independence or total dependence of these units on headquarters for decision making and control” (p.256). The transitional model would work in a huge global firm, Daft (2021) explains in the definition that it is useful in large multinational companies.
How can/should a biblical worldview be applied?
The biblical worldwide view can be applied to the proverbs 21:5 The plans of the diligent lead surely to abundance, but everyone who is hasty comes only to poverty. Proper planning can result in success and or failure in every endeavor life throws at us and every situation that arises in business.
Daft, R. L. (2021). Organization Theory & Design. Cengage.
Marnewick, A. L., & Joseph, N. (2020). The importance of planning for communication in a project during the requirements process. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(1), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2019.2952563
Streets, M. (2020, Oct 05). Shoppers Are Still Increasing Their Online Spending & They’re Looking for Alternatives to Amazon. Footwear News : FN (Online), http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fmagazines%2Fshoppers-are-still-increasing-their-online%2Fdocview%2F2448480246%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D12085
Walmart offers holiday cheer as traditional peers struggle. (2019). Canadian Business (Online),
Chapter 4: How do you think planning in today’s organizations compares to planning in an organization 25 years ago? Do you think planning becomes more important or less important in a world where everything quickly changes and crises are a regular part of organizational life? Why?
Planning in today’s organizations has drastically changed from planning in an organization 25 years ago. Last century, the environment was not as uncertain as it is today. Therefore, long-range planning and forecasting were not needed like they are today because environmental demands did not drastically change as they currently do (Daft, 2021). A calm environment allows for organizations to focus on current problems and the efficiency of day-to-day operations. Today’s environment is volatile. These volatilities are not only prevalent at home but abroad. This makes planning and forecasting crucial for future success of organizations. “…In uncertain environments, planning and environmental forecasting actually become more important as a way to keep the organization geared for a coordinated, speedy response” (Daft, 2021, p. 165).
Based on the above information, planning and forecasting is of greater importance now than ever before. The world is quickly changing, and crises are becoming a regular part of normal life. There is a strong positive relationship between strategic planning and performance (Ali, 2018). In today’s environment, every contingency needs its own contingency. For example, COVID-19 was a pandemic that no company could have foreseen. However, it drastically effected the way companies conducted business. Companies either adapted or they did not survive. This is just one reason why having cognancies in place for all types of situations is of great importance. Another reason why I think planning is more important for organizations now than ever is due to the empowerment of the entrepreneur. Anyone can start a business if a need is not currently being met or if a current organization is failing to meet the need they are expected to meet. A new company can be raised and then immediately can start competing with the other organization.
Chapter 4: Is changing the organization’s domain a feasible strategy for coping with a threatening environment? Can you think of an organization in the recent news that has changed its domain? Explain.
The changing of an organization’s domain is a feasible strategy for coping with a threatening environment. A domain “is the chosen environmental field of action. It is the territory an organization stakes out for itself with respect to products, services, and markets served. Domain defines the organization’s niche…” (Daft, 2021, p. 148). Therefore, domains are specific areas where organizations operate knowing that they have the greatest chance of remaining profitable. These domains are specifically selected based on the services offered by the organization and the need that consumers have within the specific domain. Organizations cannot stay stagnant. They either must continue to perfect their current course of action or change their course of action. If neither of these happen, they will eventually fail. It is important to analyze if the threats within the environment outweigh the opportunities that an organization must increase its market presence or its profitability.
An example of a company that shifted its domain to deal with a threatening environment would be Chipotle. The threatening environment was and still is COVID-19. Many companies shifted their domains during this pandemic, but Chipotle is working hard to thrive in its environment. Prior to the pandemic, Chipotle had no remedy for consumers who did not want to go into the store to get their meal. “However, in 2020, the company has significantly invested in high-margin drive-thru pickup lanes that it calls “Chipotlanes.” These drive-thru lanes exist primarily for mobile pickup orders, which means… it caters to customers concerned about COVID-19…” (Ludwig, 2022, n.p.). These high-margin drive-thru pickup lanes not only work to serve the consumer but it is also self-serving in the process. Chipotle will be able to increase production and sales while simultaneously increasing efficiency. Chipotle, like other food service businesses, was not anticipating that a global pandemic would strike and create such levels of fear where people could not interact near each other.
Chapter 6: Compare the descriptions of the transnational model described in Chapter 6 to the elements of the learning organization described in Chapter 1. Do you think the transnational model would work in a huge global firm?
There are stark differences and similarities between the learning organization in Chapter 1 and the transnational model described in Chapter 6. Learning organizations operate in an informal fashion (Daft, 2021). With the learning organization, an informal system is a practice that works. Decentralization is the key. The employees have discretion to take care of their own problems and solve issues at their level (Daft, 2021). Information flows freely and various parts of the organization have discretion. A learning organization seems to have similar rules as a transnational organization as it relates to knowledge sharing, learning, and cooperation between departments.
The transnational model is extremely complex and diverse. This model “represents the most advanced kind of international organization. It reflects the ultimate in both organizational complexity, with many diverse units, and organizational coordination, with mechanisms for integrating the varied parts” (Daft, 2021, p. 254). Transnational organizations have achieved the ultimate collaboration by means of effective communication between departments (Caniglia, John, Bellina, Lang, Wiek, Cohmer & Laubichler, 2018). These organizations also specialize in providing multi-faceted services which all harmoniously work together. Many varied parts are synced and operating effectively and concurrently (Daft, 2021).
The transnational model is specifically designed to work in a huge, global firm. “The transnational model is useful for large, multinational companies with subsidiaries in many countries that try to exploit both global and local advantages as well as technological advancements, rapid innovation, and global learning and knowledge sharing” (Daft, 2021, p. 254). This type of model offers global solutions through local service. These types of companies are complex. Therefore, this model offers free flowing information while simultaneously having a decentralized outlook in the sense that decision making must be pushed down the chain to aid in efficiency. This model also incorporates centralization within the different aspects of the organization. Companies with subsidiaries must be able to make their own decisions in real-time to allow for proper efficiency of decision making and execution of tasks.
How can/should a biblical worldview be applied?
Organizations that fix their eyes on Christ can trust and take heart that no matter what happens, God has it handled. Proverbs 3:5 says, “Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding” (ESV). This verse speaks volumes to how organizational leaders must give it all to God. This point can be directed to the question regarding domain and shifting domains due to threats. God always provides a way. If the opportunity presents itself to shift, that could be soft nudge from God indicating that it is time for the company to pivot and take on a new endeavor.
References
Ali, A. A. (2018). Strategic planning–organizational performance relationship: Perspectives of
previous studies and literature review. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 11(1), 8-24.
https://doi.org/10.1179/2047971915y.0000000017
Caniglia, G., John, B., Bellina, L., Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Cohmer, S., & Laubichler, M. D.
(2018). The glocal curriculum: A model for transnational collaboration in higher education for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 171, 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.207
Daft, R. L. (2021). Organization theory & design (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780357141618/pageid/82
Ludwig, S. (2021). 10 Hugely Successful Companies that Reinvented Their Business. U.S.
Chamber of Commerce. https://www.uschamber.com/co/good-company/growth-studio/successful-companies-that-reinvented-their-
business#:~:text=One%20of%20the%20most%20recent,bowls%2C%20tacos%20and%20other%20items
Criteria Ratings Points
Thread:
Content
21 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
All key components of the
Discussion prompt are
answered in the thread with the
appropriate level of citations.
An individual response has
been posted for all the
questions. The thread has a
clear, logical flow. Major points
are stated clearly. Major points
are supported by good
examples or thoughtful
analysis. At least three peer
reviewed references are
included.
18 to >17.0 pts
Proficient
Most of the components of the
Discussion prompt are
answered in the thread with the
appropriate level of citations.
An individual response has
been posted for all the
questions. The thread has a
logical flow. Major points are
stated reasonably well. Major
points are supported by good
examples or thoughtful
analysis. At least three peer
reviewed references are
included
17 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The Discussion
prompt are
addressed
minimally without
the appropriate
level of citations.
An individual
response has not
been posted for all
the questions. The
thread lacks flow or
content. Major
points are unclear
or confusing. Major
points are not
supported by
examples or
thoughtful analysis.
Less than three
peer reviewed
references are
included.
0 pts
Not
Present
21 pts
Replies:
Content
21 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
There is contribution made to
the discussion. Each reply
expounds on the thread. The
required word count (400 words
minimum each) for 2 replies is
met.
18 to >17.0 pts
Proficient
Each reply expounds on the
thread. The required word
count (400 words minimum
each) for 2 replies is met.
17 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Only one reply is
present.
0 pts
Not
Present
21 pts
Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI610_B04_202230
Criteria Ratings Points
Thread:
Grammar
and
Spelling,
APA
formatting
9 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Spelling and grammar are
correct. Sentences are
complete, clear, and concise.
Paragraphs contain
appropriately varied sentence
structures. Where applicable,
references are cited in current
APA format. Minimum word
count of 1,000 -1500 words is
met or exceeded for the main
posting. The references are
excluded from the word count.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Spelling and grammar has
some errors. Sentences are
presented as well. Paragraphs
contain some varied sentence
structures. Where applicable,
references are cited with some
APA formatting. Minimum word
count of 900-1000 words met
on the main posting. The
references are excluded from
the word count.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Spelling and
grammar errors
distract. Sentences
are incomplete or
unclear.
Paragraphs are
poorly formed.
Where applicable,
references are
minimally or not
cited in current APA
format. Minimum
word count of 1-
900 words met for
the main posting.
The references are
excluded from the
word count.
0 pts
Not
Present
9 pts
Replies:
Grammar
and
Spelling,
APA
formatting
9 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Spelling and grammar are
correct. Sentences are
complete, clear, and concise.
Paragraphs contain
appropriately varied sentence
structures. Where applicable,
references are cited in current
APA format. The references are
excluded from the word count.
Major points are supported by
the following: • At least 1
scholarly article or biblical
integration; • Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; • Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts). The replies have a
minimum of 400 words.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Spelling and grammar has
some errors. Sentences are
presented as well. Paragraphs
contain some varied sentence
structures. Where applicable,
references are cited with some
APA formatting. The references
are excluded from the word
count. Major points are
supported by the following:
• At least 1 scholarly article or
biblical integration; • Pertinent,
conceptual, or personal
examples; • Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts). The replies have a
minimum of 400 words.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Spelling and
grammar errors
distract. Sentences
are incomplete or
unclear.
Paragraphs are
poorly formed.
Where applicable,
references are
minimally or not
cited in current APA
format. The
references are
excluded from the
word count. The
replies have 1 –
350 words
minimum.
0 pts
Not
Present
9 pts
Total Points: 60
Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI610_B04_202230
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.