Week 5: capstone project paper continues
Methods/Design, Statistical Analysis
Write paper based on PICOT mention below
PICOT question: Use of sertraline versus sertraline with CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy) to treat depression in teenagers age 12-18 over a 1-year period of time. – Approved by Dr. S.
Assignment Prompt
Submit 3-4 pages describing the Methods/Design and Statistical Analysis that you will use in your project. Use the evidence from the peer reviewed articles that you have critically appraised and synthesized. Follow APA format and cite references. Include the following:
1. Describe the evaluative criteria (indicators or variables) to be addressed in answering each evaluation question.
2. Describe the research approaches to be used to answer each question and why they are appropriate to the evaluation questions posed.
3. Describe in specific detail how data will be collected related to each of your evaluative criteria/indicators. Discuss exactly how the data be collected, when, and by whom. Describe any data collection tools in terms of their development and appropriateness in answering the evaluation questions. Provide information on validity and reliability of tools, if available. Explain why the data collection methods are appropriate to the research approach, type of data, and purpose of the evaluation.
4. Describe how you will analyze the data, including specific statistical tests to be used. Include dummy data tables if applicable to show how you will display your findings.
Expectations
· Due: Monday, 11:59 pm PT
· Length: 3-4 pages not including reference and title page.
· Format: APA 7th ed.
· Research: At least two- three peer reviewed reference within the last 5 years
Rubric
Criteria
Superior
Above Average
Competent
Below Standard
Far Below Standard
Criterion Score
Objective/Health Care Problem
5 points
Objective is precise, knowledgeable, significant, and distinguished from alternate or opposing options.
4 points
Objective is precise and knowledgeable.
3 points
Objective is acceptable.
2 points
Objective may be unclear or irrelevant.
1 point
Objective is missing.
Score of Objective/Health Care Problem,
/ 5
Scope/Evidence
5 points
Skillfully arranges evidence to setup premise of the issue.
Persuasively builds the case with supportive evidence.
Elaborates on all key points of the issue.
4 points
Clearly sets up premise of the issue.
Persuasively builds the case.
Covers key points of the issue.
3 points
Sets up premise of issue.
Sufficiently persuasive to the case.
Adequate development of key issues.
2 points
Poorly sets up the premise of the issue
Minimally persuasive to the case.
Poor development of key issues.
1 point
No premise set up.
Not persuasive to the case.
Absence of key issues.
Score of Scope/Evidence,
/ 5
Analysis
5 points
Skillful recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable.
4 points
Clear recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable
3 points
Sufficient recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable.
2 points
Vague about specific action.
Action minimally reasonable.
1 point
Absence of specific action.
Action completely unreasonable.
Score of Analysis,
/ 5
Conclusion/Evaluation
5 points
Conclusion is precise, knowledgeable, significant, and distinguished from alternate or opposing options. Skillfully implicates impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality.
4 points
Conclusion is precise knowledgeable and significant.
Clearly states impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality.
3 points
Conclusion is appropriate.
Provides a basic explanation of the impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality.
2 points
Conclusion may be unclear or irrelevant.
Vague references regarding impact.
1 point
Conclusion and/or
impact is missing.
Score of Conclusion/Evaluation,
/ 5
Integration of Knowledge
5 points
Demonstrates understanding and applies concepts learned in the course at a superior level. Concepts are integrated into insights. Provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
4 points
Demonstrates understanding and applies concepts learned in the course. Conclusions are supported in reflection.
3 points
Demonstrates, for the most part, understanding and applies concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported.
2 points
Demonstrates, to a certain extent, understanding and applies some concepts learned in the course.
1 point
Does not demonstrates full understanding of concepts learned in the course.
Score of Integration of Knowledge,
/ 5
Writing Style, Formatting and Conventions
5 points
Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Exceptional writing with no grammar, APA or spelling errors
4 points
Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Excellent writing with minimal grammar, APA or spelling errors
3 points
Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Sufficient writing with minor, APA or spelling errors
2 points
Minimal references and support for opinion on policy and recommendations for changes. Many APA/Grammar and/or spelling errors.
1 point
Opinions and recommendations not well supported, Poor APA/Grammar and /or spelling
Score of Writing Style, Formatting and Conventions,
/ 5
Week 5: Discussion Question
Evaluation and Linking Evidence-Based Practice to Clinical Outcomes
Answer the question based on PICOT mention below
PICOT question: Use of sertraline versus sertraline with CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy) to treat depression in teenagers age 12-18 over a 1-year period of time. – Approved by Dr. S.
Discussion Prompt
Discuss how your research inquiry relates to evidence-based practice. What practice improvement outcomes do you expect your inquiry to accomplish? How do you intend to evaluate your capstone project?
Expectations
Initial Post:
· Due: Thursday, 11:59 pm PT
· Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references
· Citations: At least two high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.